March 29, 2020
  • 11:33 am US Navy Must Do This to Defeat Chinese in War
  • 11:33 am US NAVY HAS A NEW WAY TO COUNTER DRONES -USS DEWEY GETS ODIN !
  • 11:32 am Dragunov Variations: Military SVD, Izhmash Tiger, Chinese NDM-86
  • 11:32 am Autonomous weapons could change battlefields of the future [Advertiser content from ICRC]
  • 11:32 am US Nimitz Class vs Russia’s Admiral Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier – Military / Navy Comparison


The United States and Russia, two military
powerhouses, have had their fair share of arms races over the years. Although it is pretty common knowledge that
the US military is superior to the Russian one, there is no doubt that both nations have
impressive arsenals of weaponry. From battleships to aircraft carriers, fighter
jets to attack helicopters, there is no shortage of weapon delivery systems. We thought it would be interesting to compare
the US’s main battle tank, the M1A2 Abrams, to Russia’s main battle tank, the T90S,
in this episode of The Infographics Show, “A Tale of Two Tanks.” Don’t forget to subscribe and enable notifications
so you can see more videos like this! Previously nicknamed “The Beast” and “Whispering
Death,” the M1A2 Abrams is the United States’ main battle tank, and features some of the
best-trained tank crews in the world. The mission of the tank is described as providing
“mobile and protected firepower for superiority against heavy armor forces.” Today, they are manufactured by General Dynamics
Land Systems Division, and are expected to remain in service until 2050. They were created with an emphasis on making
visual contact with the enemy first – and less on maneuverability. The commander’s station has six periscopes
which provide a full 360 degree view. Although many of the M1A2s are upgraded from
older M1 models, the significant difference is in the computer core in the interior. The M1A2 Abrams features the best armor and
crew protection in the world, and state-of-the-art protection against internal fires. It even guards against chemical warfare agents. What sets the M1A2 and T-90S apart from other
tanks, and makes them worthy adversaries, are their impressive protective armor and
defense systems. The Russian T-90S is a versatile tank, which
has been described as a “workhorse.” Much like the American facsimile, these tanks
are expected to stay functional for decades to come. They are known for their reliability, simplicity,
layered defenses, and for having a light footprint, as they are significantly lighter than M1A2s. Adding to their versatility is their ability
to use a snorkel for deep fording into 15 feet of water with equipment that takes around
20 minutes to deploy. Perhaps the most impressive feature of the
T-90s is the Shtora-1 optronic countermeasures system, which disrupt the rangefinders of
incoming anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM) and weapons, and warns the crew when the tank
is being targeted. This uses an electro-optical jammer that jams
an enemy’s semi automatic command to line of sight anti-tank guided weaponry. Developers believe that a tank employing Shtora
countermeasures when targeted decreases the chances of being hit by an actual anti-tank
weapon by 5:1. This is a ‘soft kill’ system and is best
utilized in conjunction with a ‘hard kill’ system such as the Arena which is an active
defense system. Arena uses a Doppler radar used to detect
incoming threats, at which point a defensive rocket is fired off in order to destroy the
threat of anti-tank weapons before they hit the T-90S. Both of these tanks can sustain a hit, and
are known for their nearly impenetrable armor. M1A2 Abrams is protected by Chobham composite
armor. This is a depleted uranium mesh which is around
the hull and turret. The exact makeup of this mesh has been kept
secret, but it’s comprised of layers of ceramic composites inside steel armor, which
are then mounted on top of a normal steel armor plate. This offers superior protection against anti-tank
guided missiles, and High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) ammunition. Similar to the T-90S “Shtora,” some are
equipped with countermeasure devices to detect and jam laser-guided anti-tank missiles. The Russian tank can take one on the chin
as well. It features Kontakt-5 ERA – explosive reactive
armor. These are made from “bricks” of explosive
that are sandwiched between two metal plates, and the bricks rapidly shift sideways as the
explosive detonates. What this does is make the penetrating force
go through a larger volume of armor. This offers protection against HEAT-type projectiles
as well as Armor-Piercing Fin-Stabilized Discarding Sabot (APFSDS). In order to determine what the two tanks can
withstand, the armor must be examined against kinetic energy as expressed in millimeters
of Rolled Homogenous Armor Equivalent (RHAe). The M1A2 Abrams’ turret can withstand 940-960mm,
its Glacis can take 560-590mm, while the Lower Front Hull can take 580-650mm. The T-90S, on the other hand, comes in a bit
under with the Turret taking 750-920mm, the Glacis 670-710mm, and the Lower Front Hull
only 240mm. Moving on past the armor, let’s continue
comparing these two iron gladiators and look at the full tale of the tape. Speed: The M1A2 can reach 42 MPH, and 25 MPH
off-road. The T-90S, on the other hand, can go slightly
faster at 43.5 MPH, and 28 MPH off-road. Horsepower: The Abrams has a significantly
higher horsepower of 1,500 compared to the Russian tank’s 1,000 horsepower. Weight is a major differentiating factor between
these two tanks. The American MBT comes in at a whopping 68.7
tons, while the T-90S is a comparatively lithe 46.5 tons. Comparing their size, the M1A2 Abrams is 32.25
feet long, 12 feet wide, and 8 feet high, while the Russian T-90S is 31.25 feet long,
7.4 feet high and 12.4 feet wide. The M1A2 has a crew of four people, while
the T-90S keeps it barebones with a crew of only three. Now, we know these tanks can sustain impact
from enemy fire, but what kind of heat are these beasts packing? Let’s take a look at their weaponry. The M1A2 Abrams has a 120mm smooth bore cannon. The commander’s weapon is a 12.7mm Browning
M2 machine gun, and the loader has a 7.62mm M240 machine gun. There is an additional 7.62mm M240 machine
gun mounted coaxially on the right hand side of the main armament. Not to be outdone, the T-90S has a 125mm smoothbore
cannon that fires APFSDS, and 9M119M Refleks anti-tank gun missiles. It also has a 7.62mm machinegun in a coaxial
mount, and a 12.7mm anti-aircraft machinegun which can fire 9M119M Refleks. That said, it’s the unglamorous aspects
of these vehicles which truly sets them apart. A major weakness for the M1A2 Abrams is its
fuel consumption. Although it has a jet engine which can take
any fuel, it uses 300 gallons every eight hours. While the Russian tank holds 422 gallons of
fuel, it only takes T-2 or TS-1 kerosene, A-72 benzine, or diesel fuel. Cost is another factor separating these two
tanks. Most M1A2s are upgrades on previous M1 models
with an upgrade costing $8.58 million. The Russian T-90S tanks are built for around
$5-7 million, with an upgrade only costing about the quarter of a price of a new tank. The M1A2 Abrams may be able to withstand more
than the T-90S, but the Russians might have the advantage in creating a fleet, as it’s
estimated that each of their tanks overall cost only half as much as an M1. While the Abrams has impressive advancements
in protection, the T-90S has been able to improve on its old design without adding excess
weight to its vehicles. Check out our 2nd channel The Military Show
for live action M1A2 Abrams footage! So, which tank do you think would win in a
one-on-one “dogfight,” the M1A2 Abrams or the Russian T-90S, and which tank would
you prefer to have your military roll out in mass? Let us know in the comments! As always, don’t forget to subscribe, comment
and like.

Tony wyaad

RELATED ARTICLES
LEAVE A COMMENT